Bigham v. Chamlee

97 S.E. 407, 148 Ga. 488, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 392
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 17, 1918
DocketNo. 846
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 97 S.E. 407 (Bigham v. Chamlee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bigham v. Chamlee, 97 S.E. 407, 148 Ga. 488, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 392 (Ga. 1918).

Opinion

Hill, J.

This was an equity suit, and the plaintiff in order to obtain equity must do equity. The trial judge was authorized to find from the evidence that there was no tender by the plaintiff of the principal, interest, and costs due on the fi. fa.; and even if it be conceded that the judgment for the attorney’s fees was void, the- judge did not err in refusing an injunction against Chamlee and the sheriff, because the plaintiff did not offer to do equity by making the tender above referred to. -Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. The ease was submitted on affidavits and argument of counsel, after which the court restrained the defendant Eobertson until further order, -but refused an injunction against Chamblee and the sheriff; and the plaintiff excepted. F. A. Hooper, for plaintiff. B. N. Hardeman, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Levenson
93 S.E.2d 753 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Pass v. Pass
23 S.E.2d 697 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Oliver v. Slack
14 S.E.2d 593 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Haden v. City of Atlanta
171 S.E. 703 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 S.E. 407, 148 Ga. 488, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bigham-v-chamlee-ga-1918.