Bigham v. Chamlee
97 S.E. 407, 148 Ga. 488, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 392
Opinion
This was an equity suit, and the plaintiff in order to obtain equity must do equity. The trial judge was authorized to find from the evidence that there was no tender by the plaintiff of the principal, interest, and costs due on the fi. fa.; and even if it be conceded that the judgment for the attorney’s fees was void, the- judge did not err in refusing an injunction against Chamlee and the sheriff, because the plaintiff did not offer to do equity by making the tender above referred to. -Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bigham v. Chamlee, 97 S.E. 407, 148 Ga. 488, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 392 (Ga. 1918).
97 S.E. 407 (Bigham v. Chamlee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. Levenson
93 S.E.2d 753 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Pass v. Pass
23 S.E.2d 697 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Oliver v. Slack
14 S.E.2d 593 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Haden v. City of Atlanta
171 S.E. 703 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)