Bigham v. Chamlee
This text of 97 S.E. 407 (Bigham v. Chamlee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an equity suit, and the plaintiff in order to obtain equity must do equity. The trial judge was authorized to find from the evidence that there was no tender by the plaintiff of the principal, interest, and costs due on the fi. fa.; and even if it be conceded that the judgment for the attorney’s fees was void, the- judge did not err in refusing an injunction against Chamlee and the sheriff, because the plaintiff did not offer to do equity by making the tender above referred to. -Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 S.E. 407, 148 Ga. 488, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bigham-v-chamlee-ga-1918.