Biggs v. State

250 S.W.3d 747, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 252, 2008 WL 493368
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 26, 2008·No. WD 68053·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Donald L. Biggs, Sr. appeals the denial of his motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 (2007). After a jury trial, Biggs was convicted of robbery in the first degree for his involvement with the robbery of a convenience store in Emma, Missouri. Biggs claims that his trial counsel was deficient in that he failed to object to evidence of other uncharged crimes committed during a three-day period prior to the Emma robbery. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. The evidence in question was admissible and Biggs’s counsel’s failure to object to the admission of such evidence did not, therefore, prejudice Biggs.

Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Biggs v. State, 250 S.W.3d 747, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 252, 2008 WL 493368 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

250 S.W.3d 747 (Biggs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Case v. State
250 S.W.3d 747 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)
State v. Biggs
170 S.W.3d 498 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)