Biggs v. State
This text of 250 S.W.3d 747 (Biggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order
Donald L. Biggs, Sr. appeals the denial of his motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 (2007). After a jury trial, Biggs was convicted of robbery in the first degree for his involvement with the robbery of a convenience store in Emma, Missouri. Biggs claims that his trial counsel was deficient in that he failed to object to evidence of other uncharged crimes committed during a three-day period prior to the Emma robbery. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. The evidence in question was admissible and Biggs’s counsel’s failure to object to the admission of such evidence did not, therefore, prejudice Biggs.
Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 S.W.3d 747, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 252, 2008 WL 493368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biggs-v-state-moctapp-2008.