Biggs v. State
This text of 329 So. 2d 415 (Biggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant was charged with possession of burglary tools proscribed by Fla.Stat. § 810.06 (1973). Upon review of the briefs and record we conclude that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that the common tools found in the possession of appellant were then possessed “with intent to use or employ . . . the same [in a burglary].” The judgment is reversed and the court directed to discharge appellant.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
329 So. 2d 415, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biggs-v-state-fladistctapp-1976.