Biggs v. Sparks

258 F. 964, 49 App. D.C. 64, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1302
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMay 22, 1919
DocketNo. 3236
StatusPublished

This text of 258 F. 964 (Biggs v. Sparks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Biggs v. Sparks, 258 F. 964, 49 App. D.C. 64, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1302 (D.C. Cir. 1919).

Opinion

VAN OR.SDEF, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment for possession of leased premises in a landlord and tenant proceeding.

On July 31, 1918, appellees, plaintiffs below, purchased the premises in question for occupancy as a home, subject to the monthly tenancy of defendant. Notice to quit was given, and this proceeding to recover possession followed. Plaintiff Andrew W. Sparks and defendant were war workers. But this is not important, since plaintiffs were bona fide purchasers and entitled to possession, under the exception to the provisions of the Saulsbury Resolution of May 31, 1918 (40 Stat. 593, c. 90). Maxwell v. Brayshaw, 49 App. D. C. -, 258 Fed. 957.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maxwell v. Brayshaw
258 F. 957 (D.C. Circuit, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
258 F. 964, 49 App. D.C. 64, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biggs-v-sparks-cadc-1919.