Biggs v. Elliot

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Biggs v. Elliot

707 So. 2d 1202, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3871, 1998 WL 171508

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 15, 1998

DocketNo. 97-1943

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 707 So. 2d 1202 (Biggs v. Elliot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Biggs v. Elliot, 707 So. 2d 1202, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3871, 1998 WL 171508 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. A domestic violence injunction was entered against appellant. He now challenges the injunction, contending that his conduct in following and repeatedly telephoning the victim did not constitute “stalking” within the statutory definition of section 784.048, Florida Statutes (1995), so as to permit the issuance of an injunction under section 741.30, Florida Statutes (1995).

Section 784.048 has been upheld as constitutional against challenges of overbreadth and vagueness. See Bouters v. State, 659 So.2d 235 (Fla.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 894, 116 S.Ct. 245, 133 L.Ed.2d 171 (1995). Whether the conduct meets the statutory requirement is a question of fact for the trier of fact. In this case, we cannot conclude that the court was clearly erroneous in concluding that it did.

WARNER, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. A domestic violence injunction was entered against appellant. He now challenges the injunction, contending that his conduct in following and repeatedly telephoning the victim did not constitute “stalking” within the statutory definition of section 784.048, Florida Statutes (1995), so as to permit the issuance of an injunction under section 741.30, Florida Statutes (1995).

Section 784.048 has been upheld as constitutional against challenges of overbreadth and vagueness. See Bouters v. State, 659 So.2d 235 (Fla.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 894, 116 S.Ct. 245, 133 L.Ed.2d 171 (1995). Whether the conduct meets the statutory requirement is a question of fact for the trier of fact. In this case, we cannot conclude that the court was clearly erroneous in concluding that it did.

WARNER, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

707 So. 2d 1202, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3871, 1998 WL 171508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biggs-v-elliot-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack