Biggs v. Blount

151 S.W. 1114, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 1083
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 6, 1912·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

McMEANS, J.

The transcript in this case does not contain a copy of an assignment of errors required by the statute and rules to be filed in the court below, and it does not appear that an assignment of errors was filed in the trial court. In the absence of such assignment, this court will not consider any error but one of law that may be apparent upon the record, if the judgment is one that could have been legally rendered in the district court. As there is no fundamental error apparent of record in the proceedings, and as the judgment was one that could legally have been rendered in the district court, it is our duty to affirm the judgment, and it is so ordered. Harris v. Petty, 66 Tex. 516, 1 S. W. 525; Bopp v. Ganger, 26 S. W. 244; Lewis v. Steiner, 84 Tex. 364, 19 S. W. 516; Durham v. Garrett, 121 S. W. 1141.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Biggs v. Blount, 151 S.W. 1114, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 1083 (Tex. Ct. App. 1912).

151 S.W. 1114 (Biggs v. Blount) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of Garvin v. Freeman
181 S.W. 187 (Texas Supreme Court, 1915)