Biggins v. State
This text of 992 A.2d 1236 (Biggins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS, Defendant Below, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and RIDGELY, Justices
ORDER
MYRON T. STEELE, Chief Justice.
This 11th day of March 2010, having considered the appellant's opening brief and the State's motion to affirm, we have determined that the December 1, 2009 denial of postconviction relief should be affirmed. The Superior Court did not err when concluding that the appellant's fifth motion for postconviction relief was untimely, repetitive and procedurally defaulted without exception.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
992 A.2d 1236, 2010 WL 892106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biggins-v-state-del-2010.