Biggins v. Seaton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7040

JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LEAH T. SEATON, Deputy Public Defender; JOHN P. RUE, District Public Defender,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:10-cv-01488-PJM)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Arthur Biggins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Arthur Biggins appeals the district court’s

orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006) and denying reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Biggins

v. Seaton, No. 8:10-cv-01488-PJM (D. Md. June 11 & July 9,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED