Biggins v. Danberg
This text of Biggins v. Danberg (Biggins v. Danberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
JAMES A. BIGGINS, § § Plaintiff Below- § No. 310, 2014 Appellant, § § v. § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware, CARL DANBERG, et al., § in and for Kent County § C.A. No. 14A-03-007 Defendants Below- § Appellees. §
ORDER
This 20th day of October 2014, it appears to the Court that, on
September 11, 2014, the Court entered an order denying appellant’s motion
to proceed in forma pauperis. Appellant was ordered to pay the required
filing fee by October 15, 2014 or else his appeal would be dismissed without
further notice. Appellant failed to pay the filing fee as ordered; therefore,
dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to
Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Henry duPont Ridgely Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Biggins v. Danberg, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biggins-v-danberg-del-2014.