Biggers v. Stumpf

Fourth Circuit

Biggers v. Stumpf

669 F. App'x 115

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 3, 2016·No. No. 16-1209·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Louise Biggers appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint seeking to enjoin the foreclosure of her home. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Biggers v. Stumpf, No. 3:15-cv-00682-JAG, 2016 WL 430490 (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Louise Biggers appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint seeking to enjoin the foreclosure of her home. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Biggers v. Stumpf, No. 3:15-cv-00682-JAG, 2016 WL 430490 (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Biggers v. Stumpf, 669 F. App'x 115 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

669 F. App'x 115 (Biggers v. Stumpf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.