Biggers v. Stumpf
This text of 669 F. App'x 115 (Biggers v. Stumpf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Louise Biggers appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint seeking to enjoin the foreclosure of her home. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Biggers v. Stumpf, No. 3:15-cv-00682-JAG, 2016 WL 430490 (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
669 F. App'x 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biggers-v-stumpf-ca4-2016.