Biggers v. Hope

167 S.E. 176, 176 Ga. 141, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 408
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 15, 1932·No. No. 9173·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. Under the power conferred upon judges of the superior courts by the Civil Code of 1910, § 4850, to grant supersedeas, the judge may, in the exercise of a sound discretion, grant a supersedeas where the prevailing party is insolvent and irreparable injury is about to flow from enforcement of the judgment, although the losing party has made no attempt to obtain a supersedeas under § 6165 at or before the filing of a bill of exceptions assigning error upon the judgment overruling a motion for a new trial. Montgomery v. King, 125 Ga. 388, 391 (54 S. E. 135). In the case of Parker-Hensel Engineering Co. v. Schuler, 133 Ga. 696 (66 S. E. 800), there was no application to the judge for the grant of supersedeas under § 4850.

2. The judge did not abuse his discretion in this ease in granting a supersedeas and in temporarily enjoining enforcement of the judgment upon which error was assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoneur. Clarice & Clcvrlce, for plaintiff. Paul S. Etheridge & Sons and Morgan S. Belser, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Biggers v. Hope, 167 S.E. 176, 176 Ga. 141, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 408 (Ga. 1932).

167 S.E. 176 (Biggers v. Hope) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. Thompson
415 S.E.2d 508 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Abney v. Harris
65 S.E.2d 905 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)