Biggers v. Farmingdale United Methodist Church

168 A.D.2d 476, 562 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15455

This text of 168 A.D.2d 476 (Biggers v. Farmingdale United Methodist Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Biggers v. Farmingdale United Methodist Church, 168 A.D.2d 476, 562 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15455 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated July 24, 1989, which denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Anne Biggers seeks to recover for injuries [477]*477sustained when her foot went through a wooden porch floor located on premises owned by the defendant. The plaintiffs claim that the porch was in disrepair and that the wood was rotting. The defendant denies it had prior notice, either actual or constructive, of any defective or dangerous condition and also affirmatively asserts that the injured plaintiff’s own negligence was a proximate cause of the accident. The plaintiffs unsuccessfully sought summary judgment before Supreme Court and now appeal from the denial of their motion. We affirm.

Because there is "often a question as to whether the defendant or the plaintiff acted reasonably under the circumstances” (Andre v Pomeroy, 35 NY2d 361, 364), summary judgment is rare in negligence cases, even when the facts are undisputed (see, Andre v Pomeroy, supra, at 364). Since in this case there exist fundamental questions of fact, including, inter alia, whether the defendant had notice of the condition of which the plaintiffs complain, denial of the motion was proper. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Andre v. Pomeroy
320 N.E.2d 853 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 A.D.2d 476, 562 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biggers-v-farmingdale-united-methodist-church-nyappdiv-1990.