Bigger v. Monroe County
731 So. 2d 862, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6428, 1999 WL 312262
This text of 731 So. 2d 862 (Bigger v. Monroe County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bigger v. Monroe County, 731 So. 2d 862, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6428, 1999 WL 312262 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
Opinion
Even if, as the appellant contends, the supplemental jury instruction on attractive nuisance was error, there was no theory upon which the appellant could prevail given the facts and circumstances of this case. See Gibson v. Avis Rentr-A-Car Sys., Inc., 386 So.2d 520 (Fla.1980); Tampa Elec. Co. v. Jones, 138 Fla. 746, 190 So. 26 (1939).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gibson v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.
386 So. 2d 520 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Tampa Electric Co. v. Jones
190 So. 26 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
731 So. 2d 862, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6428, 1999 WL 312262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bigger-v-monroe-county-fladistctapp-1999.