Bigger v. Levy

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Bigger v. Levy

1 Gunby 59

DecidedJuly 1, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Gunby 59 (Bigger v. Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bigger v. Levy, 1 Gunby 59 (La. Ct. App. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

1. Where a building contract was drawn up by plaintiff, who is. a master mechanic, any obscurity in the contract will be construed against him, and in favor of defendants, who contracted the obligation which is sought to be enforced. C. C. 1958.

2. The Judge a quo properly admitted carpenters to testify as to the customary meaning of certain technical phrases used in the contract sued on. C. C. 1947.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1. Where a building contract was drawn up by plaintiff, who is. a master mechanic, any obscurity in the contract will be construed against him, and in favor of defendants, who contracted the obligation which is sought to be enforced. C. C. 1958.

2. The Judge a quo properly admitted carpenters to testify as to the customary meaning of certain technical phrases used in the contract sued on. C. C. 1947.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Gunby 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bigger-v-levy-lactapp-1885.