Bigelow v. Pine
3 N.J.L. 524
Opinion
But the court said, that it did not come within that supplement, and was correct.
It was then contended, that there was no consideration expressed in the state of demand, that an action would not lie.
[115]*115But the court was of opinion, that in a court for the trial of small causes, and after verdict, it would be too strict to reverse for that cause; and
Affirmed the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bigelow v. Pine, 3 N.J.L. 524 (N.J. 1809).
3 N.J.L. 524 (Bigelow v. Pine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.