Bigelow v. Johnson

13 Johns. 428
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1816
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 13 Johns. 428 (Bigelow v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bigelow v. Johnson, 13 Johns. 428 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1816).

Opinion

Per Curiam,.

The 7th section of the act provides, “ that if any person shall sell by retail any strong or spirituous liquors, without having a license, or if any person shall sell any strong or spirituous liquors; to be drank in his or her house, outhouse, yard, or garden, without having entered into a recognisance, every person who shall be guilty of either of the offences aforesaid, shall, for each offence, forfeit the sum of twenty-five dollars.” Here are two distinct offences described, viz. one of selling by-retail without license, and the other, selling liquor to be drank in the house, &c. without recognisance.

It is a well-settled rule, that in declaring for offences against penal statutes, (where no form is expressly given,) the plaintiff is bound to set forth specially the facts on which he relies to constitute the offence. No form is prescribed by the statute in this case ; and the plaintiff here declared against the defendant for selling spirituous liquors by retail to A. and B., contrary to the 7th section of the act. This declaration does not embrace the offence of selling liquors to be drank in the house, &c, without recognisance ; or, at least, it is equivocal. The defendant was not apprized that the latter offence would be charged against him; and as to the first offence his license was a complete answer.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Steinbeck
186 A.D. 26 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)
Turner v. McKee
137 N.C. 251 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1904)
Village of Hardwick v. Vermont Telephone & Telegraph Co.
70 Vt. 180 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1897)
Howser v. Melcher
40 Mich. 185 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1879)
Abbott v. New York Central
12 Abb. Pr. 465 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1872)
Morehouse v. Crilley
8 How. Pr. 431 (New York Supreme Court, 1853)
Ferrett v. Atwill
8 F. Cas. 1161 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1846)
Aechternacht v. Watmough
8 Watts & Serg. 162 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1844)
Wakeman v. Roache
1 Dudley Rep. 123 (Chatham Superior Court, Ga., 1832)
Greer v. Bumpass
8 Tenn. 94 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1827)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Johns. 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bigelow-v-johnson-nysupct-1816.