Bigelow v. Haviland

482 F. Supp. 2d 1002, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53316, 2007 WL 1121828
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bigelow v. Haviland. Read the opinion of the Court — 476 F. Supp. 2d 760
District Court, N.D. Ohio·Decided April 17, 2007·No. 3:01 CV 7626·Published

Opinion

ORDER

KATZ, District Judge.

This Court, having balanced the factors for deciding whether to issue a stay of a judgment granting a petition for writ of habeas corpus, hereby grants the state’s motion to stay this Court’s order of February 27, 2007 granting Petitioner Bigelow’s writ (Doc. 104). The Court has reviewed the briefs from both parties (Doc. 104, 108, 109, 110, and 111) as well as the governing caselaw, i.e., Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 775, 107 S.Ct. 2113, 95 L.Ed.2d 724 (1987) and its progeny in this and other Circuits. The Court finds that the factors weigh in favor of granting a stay pending appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The Court further finds that, given the caselaw and the facts as more fully explained in the state’s briefs (Doc. 104, 109, 111), a release on personal recognizance, as requested by Petitioner (Doc. 110) is unwarranted and hereby denied.

The state’s motion to stay (Doc. 104) is granted. Petitioner’s motion for release on personal recognizance (Doc. 110) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bigelow v. Haviland, 482 F. Supp. 2d 1002, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53316, 2007 WL 1121828 (N.D. Ohio 2007).

482 F. Supp. 2d 1002 (Bigelow v. Haviland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hilton v. Braunskill
481 U.S. 770 (Supreme Court, 1987)