Bigelow v. Grannis
4 Hill & Den. 206
CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
DecidedJanuary 15, 1843
StatusPublished
This text of 4 Hill & Den. 206 (Bigelow v. Grannis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bigelow v. Grannis, 4 Hill & Den. 206 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1843).
Opinion
By the Court,
It was enough for the plaintiffs to prove a new promise, without showing that the defendant was of age at the time of making it. It lay upon the defendant, who wished to take advantage of it, to prove the fact of infancy. This was decided upon a like issue in Borthwick v. Carruthers, (1 T. R. 648.)
New trial denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Hill & Den. 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bigelow-v-grannis-nycterr-1843.