Bigelow v. Cambridge & Concord Turnpike Corp.
7 Mass. 202
Opinion
Whenever a statute gives a right to recover damages, reduced, pursuant to the provisions of such statute, to a sum certain, an action of debt lies, if no other specific remedy is provided.
Let judgment be entered for the plaintiff for the amount agreed by the parties.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bigelow v. Cambridge & Concord Turnpike Corp., 7 Mass. 202 (Mass. 1810).
7 Mass. 202 (Bigelow v. Cambridge & Concord Turnpike Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Corwith v. Village of Hyde Park
14 Ill. App. 635 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1884)
Mills v. County Commissioners of Plymouth
82 Mass. 347 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1860)
City of Camden v. Allen
26 N.J.L. 398 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1857)
Atwood v. Rhode-Island Agricultural Bank
1 R.I. 376 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1850)
Hill v. Sayles
53 Mass. 142 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1846)
Ferrett v. Atwill
8 F. Cas. 1161 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1846)
Baker v. Braman
6 Hill & Den. 47 (New York Supreme Court, 1843)
Blackburn v. Baker
7 Port. 284 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1838)
Town of Lebanon v. Olcott
1 N.H. 339 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1818)