Bigby v. City of Tyler

44 Tex. 351
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1875·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Roberts, Chief Justice.

The prisoners have been tried and convicted before the mayor of the city of Tyler for an offense prescribed by the code, to wit, for keeping a house for public prostitution, fined fifty dollars each and costs, and ordered to remain in the hands of the city marshal until the fine and costs are paid.” Their discharge is asked upon the ground that the judgment of conviction for said offense is a nullity.

It is proposed to do hut little more than to state our conclusions.

The fine imposed under the city ordinance for this offense is an amount not exceeding one hundred dollars.

The Code of Criminal Procedure made mayors of cities magistrates, and formerly they exercised the powers of justices of the peace in the trial of criminal offenses. (Paschal’s Dig., arts. 2519, 2532.)

By the code originally they were expressly given jurisdiction to try cases of vagrants and disorderly persons. (Paschal’s Dig., art. 2528.)

An amendment of the code places the penalty above the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace for a final trial, the fine being not less than one and not more than five hundred dollars. (Paschal’s Dig., art. 2029.)

The Constitution of 1869 provides for only five justices of the peace in each county, and makes no reference to a mayor. This court has held that a mayor of a city, since the adoption of that Constitution, is not a justice of the peace, and that his authority is limited to such grant of power as maybe contained in the charter of incorporation under which he [353] acts, and to such laws as may relate to him as mayor and not as a justice of the peace, as was formerly the case.

We find in the act of incorporation of the city of Tyler no authority granted to the mayor to try this offense and render a final judgment, as was done in this case. It is a case properly cognizable by the Criminal Court of the city of Tyler, and the defendants may he proceeded against as in any other case of which that court has jurisdiction.

The prisoners must therefore he discharged and judgment entered accordingly.

Relators discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bigby v. City of Tyler, 44 Tex. 351 (Tex. 1875).

44 Tex. 351 (Bigby v. City of Tyler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Fort Worth v. First Baptist Church of Fort Worth
268 S.W. 1016 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Ex Parte A. Abrams
120 S.W. 863 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1908)
Ex Parte Anderson
81 S.W. 973 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1904)
Ex Parte Hart
56 S.W. 341 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1900)
Ex Parte Wilbarger
55 S.W. 968 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1900)
Ex Parte Coombs, Alias Shirley
44 S.W. 854 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1898)
Gibbons v. Braden
1 White & W. 128 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)
Milliken v. City Council
54 Tex. 388 (Texas Supreme Court, 1881)