Bigby v. Brantley

85 S.W. 311, 38 Tex. Civ. App. 44, 1905 Tex. App. LEXIS 401
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 21, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 85 S.W. 311 (Bigby v. Brantley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bigby v. Brantley, 85 S.W. 311, 38 Tex. Civ. App. 44, 1905 Tex. App. LEXIS 401 (Tex. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

CONNER, Chief Justice.

The defendant in error instituted this suit in the District Court of Glasscock County praying for a peremptory writ of mandamus against the plaintiffs in error, J. O. Bigby, W. E. Chaney and D. M. Lovele, trustees of school No. 3, district No. 1, said county, and against J. W. Holder, county judge and exofficio county superintendent of schools, to, among other things, compel said trustees to issue, and county superintendent to approve, warrants or vouchers for a six months’ term of school at the rate of $40 per month, to which, from the evidence, it seems he was properly entitled. The prayer of the petition was granted and a writ of mandamus awarded by the court below, from which judgment said trustees and county superintendent have prosecuted this writ of error.

It conclusively appears that the amount involved in this case exceeds *45 $200, and is less than the sum of $500. The County Court of Glasscock County, therefore, and not the District Court, had jurisdiction; from which it necessarily follows that the judgment must be reversed and the cause dismissed for reasons sufficiently stated in the cases of Dean v. State, 88 Texas, 290, 30 S. W. Rep., 1047; Johnson v. Hanscom, 90 Texas, 32, 37 S. W. Rep., 601; Lazarus v. Swofford, 15 Texas Civ. App., 367, 39 S. W. Rep., 389; McRimmon v. Moody, 87 Texas, 260.

Judgment reversed and cause dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrison v. Whitely
299 S.W. 699 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Keasler Lumber Co. v. Clark
151 S.W. 345 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 S.W. 311, 38 Tex. Civ. App. 44, 1905 Tex. App. LEXIS 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bigby-v-brantley-texapp-1905.