Bigbee v. Satterfield
This text of 32 S.E. 139 (Bigbee v. Satterfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where an equitable petition was not verified'otherwise than by an affidavit of the plaintiff averring the truth of its allegations so far as the same related to his personal knowledge, and his belief in their truth so far as his knowledge concerning the same was derived from others, and when the affidavit in this fo.rm did not amount to positive proof of portions of such allegations the establishment of which was essential, but as to the same was hearsay only, it was, upon a hearing o? su->h petition at which “there was [842]*842no evidence introduced and no evidence or 'affidavits before the court except that contained in the petition and answers,” in the latter of which the equity of the former was completely sworn off, erroneous-to grant the extraordinary relief sought.
2. Even if the present proceeding for alleged equitable relief was maintainable, and if the plaintiff, upon due proof of his allegations, would-have been entitled to such relief, — questions not now necessary to be decided, — the prayers for injunction and receiver ought,, for the reason indicated in the preceding note, to have been denied..
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 S.E. 139, 105 Ga. 841, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bigbee-v-satterfield-ga-1898.