Bigalke v. Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs
This text of 409 F. App'x 972 (Bigalke v. Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Brad Bigalke appeals the district court’s 1 final judgment dismissing with prejudice his claims of Americans With Disabilities Act violations by the State of Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs and breach of the duty of fair representation by AFSCME Counsel 5, AFL-CIO, and dismissing without prejudice his remaining state law claims. Upon careful review, see Gibson v. Weber, 433 F.3d 642, 647 (8th Cir.2006) (abuse-of-discretion review of decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction); Luney v. SGS Auto. *973 Servs., Inc., 432 F.3d 866, 867 (8th Cir.2005) (de novo review of grant of motion to dismiss), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
409 F. App'x 972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bigalke-v-minnesota-department-of-veterans-affairs-ca8-2011.