Bigalke v. Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs

409 F. App'x 972
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 11, 2011·No. 10-3303·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brad Bigalke appeals the district court’s 1 final judgment dismissing with prejudice his claims of Americans With Disabilities Act violations by the State of Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs and breach of the duty of fair representation by AFSCME Counsel 5, AFL-CIO, and dismissing without prejudice his remaining state law claims. Upon careful review, see Gibson v. Weber, 433 F.3d 642, 647 (8th Cir.2006) (abuse-of-discretion review of decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction); Luney v. SGS Auto. *973 Servs., Inc., 432 F.3d 866, 867 (8th Cir.2005) (de novo review of grant of motion to dismiss), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bigalke v. Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs, 409 F. App'x 972 (8th Cir. 2011).

409 F. App'x 972 (Bigalke v. Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related