Big-W Construction Corp. v. Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Big-W Construction Corp. v. Rosenberg

8 A.D.2d 850, 191 N.Y.S.2d 142, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7738

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 850 (Big-W Construction Corp. v. Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Big-W Construction Corp. v. Rosenberg, 8 A.D.2d 850, 191 N.Y.S.2d 142, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a general contractor of a building project against an insurance broker to recover damages for breach of an agreement to procure for a subcontractor certain performance bonds for the benefit of the general contractor, and for the return of the premium paid by it, the appeals are (1) from an order entered July 16, 1956 denying appellant’s motion to set aside the service of the summons and granting respondent’s cross motion to strike out appellant’s special appearance, and (2) from so much of an order entered October 23, 1956 as granted respondent’s motion to examine appellant before trial and as denied appellant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered entered July 16,1956 and order entered October 23, 1956 insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a general contractor of a building project against an insurance broker to recover damages for breach of an agreement to procure for a subcontractor certain performance bonds for the benefit of the general contractor, and for the return of the premium paid by it, the appeals are (1) from an order entered July 16, 1956 denying appellant’s motion to set aside the service of the summons and granting respondent’s cross motion to strike out appellant’s special appearance, and (2) from so much of an order entered October 23, 1956 as granted respondent’s motion to examine appellant before trial and as denied appellant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered entered July 16,1956 and order entered October 23, 1956 insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 850, 191 N.Y.S.2d 142, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/big-w-construction-corp-v-rosenberg-nyappdiv-1959.