Big Vein Coal Co. v. Leasure

64 A.2d 563, 192 Md. 435, 1949 Md. LEXIS 248
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMarch 9, 1949
Docket[No. 94, October Term, 1948.]
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 64 A.2d 563 (Big Vein Coal Co. v. Leasure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Big Vein Coal Co. v. Leasure, 64 A.2d 563, 192 Md. 435, 1949 Md. LEXIS 248 (Md. 1949).

Opinion

Collins, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal by the State Accident Fund, appellant, from an order of the State Industrial Accident Commission, (the Commission), allowing Milson Thomas Leasure, claimant and appellee, an employee of Big Vein Coal Company, to file an amended claim for compensation.

On July 5, 1945, appellee filed a claim, No. A47878, for an injury to his right hand, the accident occuring on June 19,1945. The Commission awarded him $23 a week during the continuance of his disability to begin on June 23, 1945. In that claim of July 5,1945, no mention was made of any injury to any other part of appellee’s body, other than the right hand. Filed with that claim was a surgeon’s report which mentioned no injury, other than the right hand.

In May, 1947, the appellee filed a petition requesting the reopening of claim No. A47878, supra, filed July 5, 1945, for the purpose of determining his disability from a back injury which he alleged he sustained at the same time he injured his right hand, the back injury not having been stated in his original claim. The Commission set *437 the case for hearing at Cumberland on August 15, 1947, on the reopening of claim No. A47878, supra. On November 14, 1947, the Commission passed an order denying compensation on the ground that the claim for the injury to claimant’s back and hip was barred by limitations. From that order the appellee appealed to the Circuit Court for Allegany County. Before the case was heard on appeal the appellee filed a petition in that court asking that the proceedings be remanded to the Commission in order that he could amend his claim. The attorney for the State Accident Fund agreeing to the remand, the case was ordered remanded to the Commission for further proceedings.

On April 7, 1948, the Commission passed an order granting leave to the appellee to file the amended claim. From that order the State Accident Fund appealed to the Circuit Court for Allegany County. The Circuit Court for Allegany County ordered the appeal dismissed and from that order the State Accident Fund appeals to this Court.

This order of the Commission allowing for claimant to amend his claim is interlocutory and not a final order at this stage of the case. The appeal must be dismissed. It has been stated many times by this Court that no appeal can be taken here from an interlocutory order. The judgment must be final before this Court has any jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Statutory provisions for appeal from, or review of, orders of administrative tribunals have generally been construed as applicable, not to interlocutory orders, but only to final orders. Penny v. Maryland State Police, 186 Md. 10, 12, 45 A. 2d 741; Elkton Supply Co. v. Stubbiles, 180 Md. 97, 99, 23 A. 2d 3, and cases there cited; Leberstein v. Leberstein, 186 Md. 25, 45 A. 2d 753; Snyder v. Cearfoss, 186 Md. 360, 366, 46 A. 2d 607; Brann v. Mahoney, 187 Md. 89, 48 A. 2d 605, 611; Katz v. Katz, 188 Md. 537, 540, 52 A. 2d 925, 927; Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 304 U. S. 375, 58 S. Ct. 963, 82 L. Ed. 1408.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Montgomery County v. Willis
979 A.2d 209 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2009)
Montgomery County v. Ward
629 A.2d 619 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1993)
Paolino v. McCormick & Co.
552 A.2d 868 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1989)
Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.
459 A.2d 205 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1983)
Md. Comm'n on Human Rel. v. BG & E. CO.
459 A.2d 205 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1983)
Williams v. McHugh
444 A.2d 475 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1982)
Steuart Investment Co. v. Board of Commissioners
381 A.2d 1174 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1978)
Great American Insurance v. Havenner
364 A.2d 95 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1976)
Chastain v. SPARTAN MILLS
88 S.E.2d 836 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1955)
Celanese Corp. of America v. Bartlett
90 A.2d 208 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1952)
Furley v. Warren-Ehret Co.
73 A.2d 497 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1950)
Bonner v. Celanese Corp. of America
66 A.2d 400 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 A.2d 563, 192 Md. 435, 1949 Md. LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/big-vein-coal-co-v-leasure-md-1949.