Big Tarkio Drainage District v. Heine

165 S.W. 340, 256 Mo. 164, 1914 Mo. LEXIS 404
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided March 24, 1914·Published

Opinion

.ROY, C.

— All tbe material facts necessary to be passed upon in tbis case are tbe same as in tbe case of tbe same plaintiff against Fritz Yoltmer, which has just been decided. [Ante, p. 152.] For tbe reasons stated in tbe opinion in tbat case, tbe judgment is reversed- and tbe cause remanded with directions to dismiss tbe proceeding to assess benefits and damages.

Williams, G., concurs.

PER CURIAM-.

— Tbe foregoing opinion of Roy, C., is adopted as tbe opinion of tbe court.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Big Tarkio Drainage District v. Heine, 165 S.W. 340, 256 Mo. 164, 1914 Mo. LEXIS 404 (Mo. 1914).

165 S.W. 340 (Big Tarkio Drainage District v. Heine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.