Big Red Box LLC v. Grisel
This text of Big Red Box LLC v. Grisel (Big Red Box LLC v. Grisel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Big Red Box, LLC, ) C/A No. 3:18-758-JMC-SVH ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. )
) ORDER OF DISMISSAL Square, Inc., William Tye Grisel, ) and Joe Grisel, ) ) Defendants. ) )
The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above action has been settled as to defendant, Square, Inc., only, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice against Square, Inc. If settlement is not consummated within sixty (60) days, either party may petition the Court to reopen this action and restore it to the calendar. F. R. Civ. P. Rule 60(b)(6). In the alternative, to the extent permitted by law, either party may within sixty (60) days petition the Court to enforce the settlement. , 571 F.2d 1299 (4th Cir. 1978). By agreement of the parties, the court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. , 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994). The dismissal hereunder shall be with prejudice if no action is taken under either alternative within sixty (60) days from the filing date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Wea. V: Hodges June 19, 2020 Shiva V. Hodges Columbia, South Carolina United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Big Red Box LLC v. Grisel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/big-red-box-llc-v-grisel-scd-2020.