Big Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Big Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California. Read the opinion of the Court — 789 F.3d 947
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 8, 2015·No. 10-17803·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BIG LAGOON RANCHERIA, a Nos. 10-17803 federally recognized Indian tribe, 10-17878 Plaintiff-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:09-cv-01471- v. CW

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellant/ ORDER Cross-Appellee.

Filed July 8, 2015

Before: Harry Pregerson, Stephen Reinhardt, Alex Kozinski, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Susan P. Graber, William A. Fletcher, Richard A. Paez, Jay S. Bybee, Milan D. Smith, Jr., Morgan Christen and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges. 2 BIG LAGOON RANCHERIA V. STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ORDER

The opinion filed June 4, 2015, and published at — F.3d —, 2015 WL 34998884, is amended as follows:

At slip opinion page six, line eight, insert a new footnote 1 after but before as follows:

.

At slip opinion page twelve, line eleven insert after and before .

At slip opinion page twelve, line fourteen insert <, 395> after <385>.

At slip opinion page eighteen, lines four–five remove and replace that text with . BIG LAGOON RANCHERIA V. STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3

At slip opinion page eighteen, line seven insert after and before .

With the foregoing amendments to the opinion, California’s Petition for En Banc Panel Rehearing is DENIED. No subsequent petitions for rehearing may be filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Big Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California, (9th Cir. 2015).

Big Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California (Big Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related