Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California

758 F.3d 1073, 2014 WL 2609714
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 11, 2014·No. Nos. 10-17803, 10-17878·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

[1074]*1074Judges Owens and Friedland did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California, 758 F.3d 1073, 2014 WL 2609714 (9th Cir. 2014).

758 F.3d 1073 (Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Big Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California
789 F.3d 947 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)