Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California

Ninth Circuit

Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California

758 F.3d 1073, 2014 WL 2609714

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 11, 2014

DocketNos. 10-17803, 10-17878

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 758 F.3d 1073 (Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California, 758 F.3d 1073, 2014 WL 2609714 (9th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

[1074]*1074Judges Owens and Friedland did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

[1074]*1074Judges Owens and Friedland did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

758 F.3d 1073, 2014 WL 2609714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/big-lagoon-rancheria-v-california-ca9-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack