Big Creek Ditch Co. v. Hoffman
280 P. 495, 130 Or. 408, 1929 Ore. LEXIS 211
This text of 280 P. 495 (Big Creek Ditch Co. v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Big Creek Ditch Co. v. Hoffman, 280 P. 495, 130 Or. 408, 1929 Ore. LEXIS 211 (Or. 1929).
Opinion
In this case, except for the amount of the judgment, the facts are identical with those in the case of Big Creek Ditch Co. v. Hulick, ante, p. 401, and the same rules of law apply.
*409 From this it follows that the judgment must be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Davis v. Van Winkle
280 P. 495 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1929)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
280 P. 495, 130 Or. 408, 1929 Ore. LEXIS 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/big-creek-ditch-co-v-hoffman-or-1929.