Big Creek Ditch Co. v. Hoffman
280 P. 495, 130 Or. 408, 1929 Ore. LEXIS 211
Opinion
In this case, except for the amount of the judgment, the facts are identical with those in the case of Big Creek Ditch Co. v. Hulick, ante, p. 401, and the same rules of law apply.
*409 From this it follows that the judgment must be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Big Creek Ditch Co. v. Hoffman, 280 P. 495, 130 Or. 408, 1929 Ore. LEXIS 211 (Or. 1929).
280 P. 495 (Big Creek Ditch Co. v. Hoffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. Van Winkle
280 P. 495 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1929)