Biesinger, Dpm v. Absolute Foot Care Specialists
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DAVID P. BIESINGER, DPM, AN No. 84141 INDIVIDUAL, Appellant, vs.
FILED
ABSOLUTE FOOT CARE FEB 1 1 2022 SPECIALISTS, A NEVADA
ELIZABETH A. BROWN
CORPORATION, CLERKSCALIPRELIE COURT BY `‘(c
Res • ondent. DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This appeal was docketed on January 27, 2022, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 7 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2).
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN
BY:t
cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Takos Law Group, Ltd. Bailey Kennedy Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER
A7,1-0t-Au9i
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Biesinger, Dpm v. Absolute Foot Care Specialists (Biesinger, Dpm v. Absolute Foot Care Specialists) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.