Biesinger, Dpm v. Absolute Foot Care Specialists

Nevada Supreme Court

Biesinger, Dpm v. Absolute Foot Care Specialists

DecidedFebruary 11, 2022

Docket84141

StatusPublished

This text of Biesinger, Dpm v. Absolute Foot Care Specialists (Biesinger, Dpm v. Absolute Foot Care Specialists) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Biesinger, Dpm v. Absolute Foot Care Specialists, (Neb. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DAVID P. BIESINGER, DPM, AN No. 84141 INDIVIDUAL, Appellant, vs. FILED ABSOLUTE FOOT CARE FEB 1 1 2022 SPECIALISTS, A NEVADA ELIZABETH A. BROWN CORPORATION, CLERKSCALIPRELIE COURT BY `‘(c Res • ondent. DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This appeal was docketed on January 27, 2022, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 7 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2). It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN

BY:t

cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Takos Law Group, Ltd. Bailey Kennedy Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

CLERK'S ORDER

A7,1-0t-Au9i

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DAVID P. BIESINGER, DPM, AN No. 84141 INDIVIDUAL, Appellant, vs. FILED ABSOLUTE FOOT CARE FEB 1 1 2022 SPECIALISTS, A NEVADA ELIZABETH A. BROWN CORPORATION, CLERKSCALIPRELIE COURT BY `‘(c Res • ondent. DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This appeal was docketed on January 27, 2022, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 7 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2). It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN

BY:t

cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Takos Law Group, Ltd. Bailey Kennedy Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

CLERK'S ORDER

A7,1-0t-Au9i

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Biesinger, Dpm v. Absolute Foot Care Specialists, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biesinger-dpm-v-absolute-foot-care-specialists-nev-2022.