Bierschenk v. Dunphy
36 N.Y.S. 1122, 98 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 639, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 899
This text of 36 N.Y.S. 1122 (Bierschenk v. Dunphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bierschenk v. Dunphy, 36 N.Y.S. 1122, 98 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 639, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 899 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
Opinion
This is an appeal by the owner from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The case was tried before a judge without a jury, and the findings are supported by the evidence. The record presents no error of law, and the judgment should be affirmed, with costs. BROAVN, J., dissents, without opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
36 N.Y.S. 1122, 98 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 639, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bierschenk-v-dunphy-nysupct-1895.