Biermann v. Halel

Missouri Court of Appeals

Biermann v. Halel

879 S.W.2d 797, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1229, 1994 WL 384700

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 26, 1994·No. No. 64913·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s order sustaining Defendants’ motion to dismiss their common law action for personal injuries. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record and find no error of law. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s order sustaining Defendants’ motion to dismiss their common law action for personal injuries. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record and find no error of law. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Biermann v. Halel, 879 S.W.2d 797, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1229, 1994 WL 384700 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

879 S.W.2d 797 (Biermann v. Halel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.