Bierman v. Violette

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bierman v. Violette

554 S.W.3d 567

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 21, 2018·No. No. ED 100946-01·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sheri Bierman appeals the trial court's judgment dismissing her negligence action against her co-employee, Kimmie Violette, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Sheri Bierman appeals the trial court's judgment dismissing her negligence action against her co-employee, Kimmie Violette, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Bierman v. Violette, 554 S.W.3d 567 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

554 S.W.3d 567 (Bierman v. Violette) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.