Biering v. Sonnenthal

Fifth Circuit

Biering v. Sonnenthal

114 F. 1017, 51 C.C.A. 683, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4165

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 22, 1902·No. No. 1,119·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The motion of appellant to set aside the sales made in the bankruptcy of E. J. Biering does not state sufficient facts to warrant the [1018] vacation oí said sales, In that It is not alleged that there was any fraud, accident, or mistake, nor sufficiently alleged that the property was sold at such an inferior price that injury to the estate of the bankrupt or to the creditors can be predicated thereon. The demurrer to said motion was properly sustained, and the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The motion of appellant to set aside the sales made in the bankruptcy of E. J. Biering does not state sufficient facts to warrant the [1018] vacation oí said sales, In that It is not alleged that there was any fraud, accident, or mistake, nor sufficiently alleged that the property was sold at such an inferior price that injury to the estate of the bankrupt or to the creditors can be predicated thereon. The demurrer to said motion was properly sustained, and the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Biering v. Sonnenthal, 114 F. 1017, 51 C.C.A. 683, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4165 (5th Cir. 1902).

Pincite

114 F. 1017 (Biering v. Sonnenthal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.