Biering v. Sonnenthal

Fifth Circuit

Biering v. Sonnenthal

114 F. 1017, 51 C.C.A. 683, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4165

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 22, 1902

DocketNo. 1,119

StatusPublished

This text of 114 F. 1017 (Biering v. Sonnenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Biering v. Sonnenthal, 114 F. 1017, 51 C.C.A. 683, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4165 (5th Cir. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The motion of appellant to set aside the sales made in the bankruptcy of E. J. Biering does not state sufficient facts to warrant the [1018]*1018vacation oí said sales, In that It is not alleged that there was any fraud, accident, or mistake, nor sufficiently alleged that the property was sold at such an inferior price that injury to the estate of the bankrupt or to the creditors can be predicated thereon. The demurrer to said motion was properly sustained, and the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The motion of appellant to set aside the sales made in the bankruptcy of E. J. Biering does not state sufficient facts to warrant the [1018]*1018vacation oí said sales, In that It is not alleged that there was any fraud, accident, or mistake, nor sufficiently alleged that the property was sold at such an inferior price that injury to the estate of the bankrupt or to the creditors can be predicated thereon. The demurrer to said motion was properly sustained, and the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 F. 1017, 51 C.C.A. 683, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biering-v-sonnenthal-ca5-1902.