Bieranowski v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
This text of Bieranowski v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Bieranowski v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-659V Filed: July 16, 2018 Not for Publication
************************************* BETH BIERANOWSKI, * * Petitioner, * * * Damages decision based on stipulation; v. * pneumococcal conjugate (Prevnar 13) * vaccine; left shoulder injury SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * ************************************* Jessica A. Olins, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Traci R. Patton, Washington, DC, for respondent.
MILLMAN, Special Master
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
On July 16, 2018, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to settle this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury that was caused by her May 6, 2016 receipt of pneumococcal conjugate (“Prevnar 13”) vaccine. Respondent denies that the Prevnar 13 vaccine caused petitioner’s left shoulder injury or any other injury. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve this matter informally.
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to delete such information prior to the document’s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall delete such material from public access. The undersigned finds the terms of the stipulation to be reasonable. The court hereby adopts the parties’ said stipulation, attached hereto, and awards compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards a lump sum of $55,000.00, representing reimbursement for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) (2012). The award shall be in the form of a check payable to petitioner in the amount of $55,000.00.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 16, 2018 s/ Laura D. Millman Laura D. Millman Special Master
2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bieranowski v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bieranowski-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2018.