Bienvenido Fernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bienvenido Fernandez v. State

503 So. 2d 461, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12040

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 10, 1987

DocketNo. 86-1786

StatusPublished

This text of 503 So. 2d 461 (Bienvenido Fernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bienvenido Fernandez v. State, 503 So. 2d 461, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12040 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the record reflects that the state presented ample proof of defendant’s guilt and defendant has not demonstrated reversible error, we affirm the judgment of conviction and sentence. § 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1985); see Perri v. State, 441 So.2d 606 (Fla.1983); Rose v. State, 425 So.2d 521 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909, 103 S.Ct. 1883, 76 L.Ed.2d 812 (1983), disapproved in part on other grounds, Williams v. State, 488 So.2d 62 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the record reflects that the state presented ample proof of defendant’s guilt and defendant has not demonstrated reversible error, we affirm the judgment of conviction and sentence. § 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1985); see Perri v. State, 441 So.2d 606 (Fla.1983); Rose v. State, 425 So.2d 521 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909, 103 S.Ct. 1883, 76 L.Ed.2d 812 (1983), disapproved in part on other grounds, Williams v. State, 488 So.2d 62 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

503 So. 2d 461, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bienvenido-fernandez-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack