Bienenfeld v. Consolidated Gas Co.

119 A.D. 855, 103 N.Y.S. 1116
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1907·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

For the reasons stated in the case of Pollitz v. Consolidated Gas Co. (118 App. Div. 92), decided hy this court March 8, 1907, the orders appealed from must b.e reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and' the motion denied, with ten dollars costs in each case, with- leave to renew on payment of the required deposit. Present — Patterson, P. 'J., Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Orders reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements in each case, and motions denied, with fen dollars costs in each case, with leave to rénew as stated in opinion. Settle orders on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bienenfeld v. Consolidated Gas Co., 119 A.D. 855, 103 N.Y.S. 1116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

119 A.D. 855 (Bienenfeld v. Consolidated Gas Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Union Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Mulligan
197 S.W. 1081 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1917)