Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bienaime v. Florida Unemployment Appeals

Bienaime v. Florida Unemployment Appeals

853 So. 2d 1119, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13607, 2003 WL 22083544
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 10, 2003
DocketNo. 3D03-728
StatusPublished

This text of 853 So. 2d 1119 (Bienaime v. Florida Unemployment Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bienaime v. Florida Unemployment Appeals, 853 So. 2d 1119, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13607, 2003 WL 22083544 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See St. Augustine Church v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 754 So.2d 183, 185 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (employee was guilty of misconduct where record contained competent substantial evidence to support referee finding of insubordination); see also Stahl v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 502 So.2d 78, 79 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (insubordinate challenge of foreman’s authority in the presence of other employees constituted misconduct).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Augustine Church v. FLA. UNEMP. APP. COM'N.
754 So. 2d 183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Stahl v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Com'n
502 So. 2d 78 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
853 So. 2d 1119, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13607, 2003 WL 22083544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bienaime-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-fladistctapp-2003.