Bielecki v. Max Hertz Leather Co.
131 A. 921, 102 N.J.L. 432, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 184
This text of 131 A. 921 (Bielecki v. Max Hertz Leather Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bielecki v. Max Hertz Leather Co., 131 A. 921, 102 N.J.L. 432, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 184 (N.J. 1926).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
*433 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Rone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Trecartin v. Mahony-Troast Construction Co.
87 A.2d 349 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Farrell v. Diamond Alkali Co.
83 A.2d 900 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
131 A. 921, 102 N.J.L. 432, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bielecki-v-max-hertz-leather-co-nj-1926.