Bielak v. Bielak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bielak v. Bielak

114 A.D.2d 831, 495 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53839

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 4, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 114 A.D.2d 831 (Bielak v. Bielak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bielak v. Bielak, 114 A.D.2d 831, 495 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme [832]*832Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated October 5, 1984, as denied her application for a pendente lite award of child support and maintenance.

Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, with costs, and plaintiff is awarded pendente lite relief of $200 per week child support and $50 per week maintenance retroactive to the date of her application.

Based upon the facts contained in the record, plaintiff is entitled to pendente lite relief to the extent indicated. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme [832]*832Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated October 5, 1984, as denied her application for a pendente lite award of child support and maintenance.

Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, with costs, and plaintiff is awarded pendente lite relief of $200 per week child support and $50 per week maintenance retroactive to the date of her application.

Based upon the facts contained in the record, plaintiff is entitled to pendente lite relief to the extent indicated. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 A.D.2d 831, 495 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bielak-v-bielak-nyappdiv-1985.