Biehn v. Thompson

123 So. 767, 98 Fla. 265
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 31, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 123 So. 767 (Biehn v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Biehn v. Thompson, 123 So. 767, 98 Fla. 265 (Fla. 1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this cause the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Strum are of opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be reversed. Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Brown arid Mr. Justice Buford are of opinion that said decree should be affirmed. When it *266 appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether a decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed. -

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford,, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 So. 767, 98 Fla. 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biehn-v-thompson-fla-1929.