Biegeleisen v. Biegeleisen
This text of 124 A.D.2d 692 (Biegeleisen v. Biegeleisen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In view of the existence of disputed issues of fact, Special Term should have held a hearing to determine whether an upward modification of the defendant’s child support obligations was appropriate. Similarly, a hearing should be conducted to determine the defendant’s obligation to pay alleged arrears in medical expenses. Finally, while the defendant may be responsible to pay for the plaintiff’s counsel fees under the terms of the parties’ separation agreement, he should be afforded the opportunity to challenge the reasonableness of those fees. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 A.D.2d 692, 508 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biegeleisen-v-biegeleisen-nyappdiv-1986.