Biedermann v. Biedermann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Biedermann v. Biedermann

38 A.D.2d 854, 330 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5268

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 854 (Biedermann v. Biedermann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Biedermann v. Biedermann, 38 A.D.2d 854, 330 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5268 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for divorce, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 21, 1971, which denied his motion to amend his previously amended second counterclaim. Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted. The second amended second counterclaim shall be served within 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. In our opinion, under all the circumstances, the exercise of a sound discretion and the interests of justice require that appellant be allowed to amend his amended second counterclaim. Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for divorce, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 21, 1971, which denied his motion to amend his previously amended second counterclaim. Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted. The second amended second counterclaim shall be served within 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. In our opinion, under all the circumstances, the exercise of a sound discretion and the interests of justice require that appellant be allowed to amend his amended second counterclaim. Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 854, 330 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biedermann-v-biedermann-nyappdiv-1972.