Biederman v. Finegan
247 A.D. 770
Opinion
Order denying petitioner’s motion for a peremptory or alternative order of mandamus unanimously affirmed, with twenty doEars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Biederman v. Finegan, 247 A.D. 770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
247 A.D. 770 (Biederman v. Finegan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.