Biederman v. Edson & Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Biederman v. Edson & Co.

128 Misc. 455, 219 N.Y.S. 115, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 811

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 128 Misc. 455 (Biederman v. Edson & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Biederman v. Edson & Co., 128 Misc. 455, 219 N.Y.S. 115, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Although a levy appears to have been made under Iser’s judgment on March 1, 1926, the evidence sufficiently indicates that the judgment creditor there and his attorney had notice at the time that title to the automobile had been reserved to defendant Edson & Company, Inc., under an unfiled conditional sale agreement with the judgment debtor. Consequently defendant Edson & Company, Inc., was entitled to possession of the automobile until payment of the judgment which it thereafter [456]*456obtained in its action to foreclose its vendor’s lien. (See Pers. Prop. Law, § 65, as added by Laws of 1922, chap. 642.)

The judgment must, therefore, be reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and the complaint dismissed.

All concur; present, Bijur, O’Malley and Levy, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Although a levy appears to have been made under Iser’s judgment on March 1, 1926, the evidence sufficiently indicates that the judgment creditor there and his attorney had notice at the time that title to the automobile had been reserved to defendant Edson & Company, Inc., under an unfiled conditional sale agreement with the judgment debtor. Consequently defendant Edson & Company, Inc., was entitled to possession of the automobile until payment of the judgment which it thereafter [456]*456obtained in its action to foreclose its vendor’s lien. (See Pers. Prop. Law, § 65, as added by Laws of 1922, chap. 642.)

The judgment must, therefore, be reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and the complaint dismissed.

All concur; present, Bijur, O’Malley and Levy, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 Misc. 455, 219 N.Y.S. 115, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biederman-v-edson-co-nyappterm-1926.