Bieder v. Macduff

283 A.D. 725, 127 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5078
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 8, 1954·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion by petitioner to dispense with printing denied, without costs, and without prejudice to renewal. The motion is premature. A proceeding to review the determination of the respondent, Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, must be initiated at Special Term. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1287.) The Special Term may then determine the proceeding or, under certain circumstances, transfer it to this court. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1296, subd. 7.) From the papers submitted it does not appear that any proceeding has been commenced at Special Term or that this court presently has any jurisdiction. If petitioner subsequently should make an application for leave to proceed as a “poor person”, the papers thereon should comply with the relevant statutory provisions. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 196, 558; Rules Civ. Prac., rules 35, 36.) Present — -Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MaeCrate and Murphy, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bieder v. Macduff, 283 A.D. 725, 127 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5078 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

283 A.D. 725 (Bieder v. Macduff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tommy & Tina, Inc. v. Department of Consumer Affairs
117 Misc. 2d 415 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)