Bieder v. Macduff
This text of 283 A.D. 725 (Bieder v. Macduff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion by petitioner to dispense with printing denied, without costs, and without prejudice to renewal. The motion is premature. A proceeding to review the determination of the respondent, Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, must be initiated at Special Term. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1287.) The Special Term may then determine the proceeding or, under certain circumstances, transfer it to this court. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1296, subd. 7.) From the papers submitted it does not appear that any proceeding has been commenced at Special Term or that this court presently has any jurisdiction. If petitioner subsequently should make an application for leave to proceed as a “poor person”, the papers thereon should comply with the relevant statutory provisions. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 196, 558; Rules Civ. Prac., rules 35, 36.) Present — -Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MaeCrate and Murphy, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D. 725, 127 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5078, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bieder-v-macduff-nyappdiv-1954.