Bieber v. Thoma

194 Ill. App. 441, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 511
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJune 17, 1915
DocketGen. No. 20,495
StatusPublished

This text of 194 Ill. App. 441 (Bieber v. Thoma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bieber v. Thoma, 194 Ill. App. 441, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 511 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Pam

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and error, § 843*—when signing of bill of exceptions by another judge unauthorized. The signing of a bill of exceptions and the ordering of the filing thereof as per day of presentation by a judge who did not try the case does not confer validity upon it, where the bill of exceptions was marked “presented” by the trial judge and filed without his signature with the clerk of court before the expiration of the time for filing, and there was nothing in the order of the second judge or in the record to show that the trial judge was unable to sign the bill of exceptions before it was filed with the clerk, or for five weeks after expiration of date of filing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 Ill. App. 441, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bieber-v-thoma-illappct-1915.