Bieber v. Harriet Amusement Co.

260 A.D. 1040, 24 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5980

This text of 260 A.D. 1040 (Bieber v. Harriet Amusement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bieber v. Harriet Amusement Co., 260 A.D. 1040, 24 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Appeal by defendant Louis Schleier, in an action brought by a judgment creditor under section 1189 of the Civil Practice Act, from an order denying his motion for judgment on the pleadings. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The determination of the validity of the pleaded defense should await the trial. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 A.D. 1040, 24 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bieber-v-harriet-amusement-co-nyappdiv-1940.