Bie v. City of Indian Rocks Beach

100 So. 2d 803
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 5, 1958·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decree appealed from has been duly considered and the record examined in the light of briefs filed. We find no reversible error is made to appear.

Affirmed. See Carn v. Moore, 74 Fla. 77, 76 So. 337; Gilligan v. Special Road & [804] Bridge District, 74 Fla. 320, 77 So. 84; State ex rel. Pooser v. Wester, 126 Fla. 49, 170 So. 736; Bay County v. State, 157 Fla. 47, 24 So.2d 714; Willets v. North Bay Village, Fla.1952, 60 So.2d 922.

TERRELL, C. J., HOBSON, THOR-NAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., and PEARSON, District Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bie v. City of Indian Rocks Beach, 100 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 1958).

100 So. 2d 803 (Bie v. City of Indian Rocks Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Wald v. Quarnstrom
60 So. 2d 919 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
Bay County Florida v. State
24 So. 2d 714 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1946)
State Ex Rel. Pooser v. Wester
170 So. 736 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Carn v. Moore
76 So. 337 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1917)
Gilligan v. Special Road & Bridge District Number Four
77 So. 84 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1917)